Magnetic “Monopoles”

January 30, 2014

Magnetic “Monopoles”

Filed under: Science — transpower @ 1:09 pm

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/01/140129164807.htm

So the scientists have created a synthetic “monopole”; they have not discovered a natural monopole. In the Reciprocal System, an atom has two rotating systems, and so a magnetically-charged atom actually has two orthogonal charges, one on each rotating system. Subatoms have one rotating system, so where feasible, they can take one magnetic charge. A magnetic charge is a two-dimensional rotational vibration in the Reciprocal System, and so even a single charge would have two poles, N and S. So a natural monopole is not possible, although a monocharge is.

Study the Reciprocal System and prove it for yourself. https://transpower.wordpress.com

Comments (2)

2 Comments »

Reblogged this on High on Science & Tech – H.O.S.T.

Comment by AD — January 30, 2014 @ 1:28 pm

Reply
Contrast the Reciprocal System’s clear explanation for the whys of science with that of legacy physics. For example watch Richard Feynman (a man I usually highly admire) try to answer a simple layman’s why on magnetism: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjmtJpzoW0o and weep.

Comment by The other AD — March 12, 2014 @ 6:09 am

Reply