RECIPROCAL SYSTEM DATABASE Status Report: An Aperiodic Blog

July 30, 2013

The Simplistic, Irrational Nature of “RationalWiki.org”

Filed under: Science — transpower @ 7:21 pm

According to “RationalWiki.org,” the Reciprocal System is “psedoscience”, so we decided to take a deeper look at “RationalWiki.” It turns out that this supposed online encyclopedia is just an outline, more or less, and a very poor one at that; it seems like the articles are written for 9th graders. Very few of the articles have scientific value. We could find no article on space-time, electric current, thermal current, capacitors, magnetism, stellar energy generation, or galactic structure. We did find some very weak articles on radiation, atoms, subatomic particles, chemistry, gravity, and stars. There is only a one sentence description of cosmology! Thus, it’s obvious that there is vastly more real science here on our Reciprocal System Database site, https://transpower.wordpress.com. Forget about “RationalWiki.org”–it’s a pseudo-encyclopedia!

Advertisements

4 Comments »

  1. I take pleasure in, cause I found just what I was looking for.

    You’ve ended my 4 day long hunt! God Bless you man. Have a nice day.

    Bye

    Comment by hydraulic tubes — May 31, 2014 @ 1:28 am

  2. I comment each time I appreciate a poset on a website or I have something to valuable to contdibute
    to the discussion. It is a result oof the passion displayed in the post I
    read. And on this pokst The Simplistic, Irrational Nature oof “RationalWiki.org” |
    RECIPROCAL SYSTEM DATABASE Status Report: An Aperiodic Blog.
    I was excited ennough to leave a leave a responsea response :
    -P I actually do ave a couple of questions for you if it’s okay.
    Is it only mme or does it look like some of these responses appear ass if they are left by brain dead folks?
    😛 And, if yoou are writing at other sites, I would like to keep up with you.
    Could you list all of all your public ssites like
    your linkedin profile, Facebook page or twitter feed?

    Comment by italian charm — July 13, 2014 @ 11:08 pm

  3. It is full of nasty opinions as well. Just look at the expanding and shrinking earth theories. Or especially when it comes to YEC. If they are to be an encyclopedia, they should use neutral language, or at best, mild opinions.
    PS they have a snarky point of view which they do admit somewhere. Why they call it rational, I have no clue, but it may be as a nagging joke.

    Comment by Jj — September 3, 2015 @ 5:37 pm

  4. Almost all of the content on RationalWiki is factually INCORRECT. It’s compromised of people who got kicked out of wikipeadia within 1-2 days because of them not understanding any laws of Rationality.

    The truth simply doesn’t matters. They have various articles under “Logic” section which simply do not exists elsewhere! These completely incorrect, illogical and biased articles are then used to “debunk” various people!

    Try making a single edit which questions any of there irrationality, they aren’t interested in facts at all!

    Comment by David Gerald — February 4, 2017 @ 3:11 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: