RECIPROCAL SYSTEM DATABASE Status Report: An Aperiodic Blog

July 30, 2013

Does “Anti-Matter” Fall Upward?

Filed under: Science — transpower @ 2:19 pm

Christopher James Huff, otherwise known as “cjameshuff”, doesn’t understand the situtation very well. He says: “Related to this argument, the energy content of a system gives it positive gravity. Put 500 g of matter and 500 g of antimatter in an unobtanium box, and if the antimatter experiences antigravity, the weight of the two cancels out. Annihilate the two, and the box suddenly gains 1 kg of weight. Why such a bizarre asymmetry? Why would energy behave differently only in the form of antimatter?”

Actually there is no such thing as “antimatter.” It’s really “inverse matter.” Inverse matter in our half of the universe still has mass, and so it doesn’t “fall upward.” There is perfect symmetry in our physical universe: our half, the material sector, exists below the speed of light; the other half, the cosmic sector, exists above the speed of light–but the velocity equation flips, so in that sector there is motion in time, rather than in space. Inverse matter here, in our sector, decays in a brief amount of time. Its mass here is inverse to the mass it has in its native sector. If an inverse proton combines with a material proton, the result is radiation–there is no mass here, just energy! [Note: the annihilation is not necessarily as simple as it is in the electron-positron situation. Other particles may be created, which eventually convert to radiation.]

Also, this poor fellow still doesn’t understand what happens in the “two-capacitor problem.” He still thinks that “charge conservation” holds, even if it violates the known law of energy conservation. Like many slaves to conventional physics, he says that somehow “the energy is radiated away”–but no such energy has ever been measured. The voltage of the second capacitor is higher than that predicted by conventional capacitor theory, which therefore disproves it. The electrons in ordinary electrical circuits are massless, and chargeless; conventional theory does not tell us what an ordinary electron is: it is just accepted as a “given” feature of nature. The Reciprocal System is thousands of light years ahead of conventional theory.

Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at

%d bloggers like this: